Intolerable Consent

When the Cost of Government Compliance Crosses The Line

Former High-ranking Federal Officials Getting Rich By Stealing Civilian Liberties

Who is Michael Chertoff? Why are former high-ranking federal officials getting rich by stealing our liberties?

Email This BlogThis!Share to X Share to Facebook Share to Pinterest

Labels: Executive Branch: TSA, Patriot Act, Theft By Majority Vote, U.S. Constitution: 4th

Newer Post Older Post Home

The Intolerable Acts

The colonists saw the Intolerable Acts as "a violation of their constitutional rights, their natural rights, and their colonial charters". Today, we are witnessing laws enacted, especially administrative laws, that, Richard Henry Lee of Virginia might have described as "a most wicked System for destroying the liberty of America." Even while these laws cause obviously grievous transgressions against the citizenry they claim to be protecting, often we are told these laws are for our own benefit. No thanks!

Rights, Grievances and Intolerable Acts

Caste System (1)
Congress (1)
Congress's Bad Law: CAPTA - Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (1)
Crony Capitalism (1)
Eminent Domain (1)
Executive Branch: Administrative Law (2)
Executive Branch: FDA (1)
Executive Branch: Interior Dept (1)
Executive Branch: TSA (43)
Extra-Constitutional: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (1)
Extra-Constitutional: Federal Reserve (2)
Food Coercion (1)
Government as the Aggressor (1)
Gun Control (2)
Intangible (5)
Morals (2)
Non-Productive Orientation (1)
Non-Profit Foundations (1)
Patriot Act (1)
Sarbanes-Oxley (1)
Social Services (1)
Theft By Majority Vote (1)
Theft By Manipulation (1)
TSA (2)
U.S. Constitution: 2nd (2)
U.S. Constitution: 4th (14)
U.S. Constitution: 10th (2)
U.S. Constitution: 20th (1)
U.S. Constitution: Commerce Clause (2)
U.S. Constitution: Entangling Treaties (1)
U.S. Constitution: Enumerated Powers (1)
U.S. Constitution: Right to Travel (1)
U.S. Constitution: Weights and Measures (2)
War on Drugs (2)

HR 6416: The American Traveler Dignity Act

The legislation is simple. It establishes that airport security screeners are not immune from any US law regarding physical contact with another person, making images of another person, or causing physical harm through the use of radiation-emitting machinery on another person. It means they are subject to the same laws as the rest of us. http://dailypaul.com/node/149693

Are we a Nation of Laws or Bureaucrats?

Blog Archive

▼ 2010 (59)
- ► December (10)
- ▼ November (44)
- ► October (1)
- ► June (1)
- ► April (1)
- ► February (1)
- ► January (1)

► 2009 (1)
- ► October (1)

► 2008 (2)
- ► October (1)
- ► June (1)

► 2005 (3)
- ► July (1)
- ► June (1)
- ► March (1)

► 2004 (2)
- ► November (2)

► 2002 (4)
- ► December (1)
- ► November (2)
- ► August (1)

Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.